A patent is a set of exclusive rights granted to the innovator to guard his interests for the upcoming two decades or so, when no one else can copy the item or has to pay royalties to do so. The entire framework behind this was to be sure the innovator gets monitory and first mover benefits for his research and development, to make certain individuals have incentives to do more research and technologies keep coming in markets for the welfare of humanity. Little did the creator of patents law knew that it will be used to hinder the expansion, create monopolies, utilized to backfire/compress or terminate competitors and as a medium to earn riches.
But, it has degraded to your level when a company can just discuss out new features and file Inventhelp Commercials for the similar. The end result is many companies earning millions and millions not simply because they manufacture such quality products, because these were the first one to consider a concept. Today’s MNCs don’t shy away in extracting exorbitant amount in royalty fees, licensing fees, court claims and settlements. A single new product leads to usage of dozens of old patents (using their licensing fees) and introduction of two dozen more patents. A patent is not supposed to be for how you will scroll content on an iPhone or the quantity of image processors in a single Kodak camera. Obviously the patent could be for the piece of hardware, the circuit or the code written. But, if someone else is able to produce similar or better output with their own code, hardware or circuits, that will not make them liable to pay for the other company.
Legal requirements firms, not understanding any nuances of technologies, blindly approves patents and produces a ground for patent wars.
Its not surprising to sees the world’s largest and oldest manufacturer Nokia, fighting with new niche premium mobile manufacturer Apple over the patent wars. Nokia sued Apple over usage of signalling techniques, Apple fired back over the utilization of scrollbars and Nokia again filed a brand new lawsuit against Apple’s iPad. The war similar to the situation when Kodak sued Apple and Apple countersued Kodak.
This war is for patents, but, it is far from because these companies are hindering innovation or were unable to recover their research and development charges due to the other’s patent infringement. This war is completely according to greed, the greed top earn more and eat each other’s profit share. Finally, the two is going to do an from court agreement, something similar to, you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours.
Maybe American companies may also study from these MNCs and start constructing a pile of patents. Like that the big telecoms can just sit back and earn royalties. Poor Bharti Airtel, if Mr. Sunil Mittal had filed Inventhelp Phone Number for caller tunes or missed call alert service, Airtel could have crossed each of their barriers in terms of growth and had been world’s largest telecom company. On the similar lines, if Infosys had patented its global delivery model, it might have easily axed the competing firms along with ruled the offshore IT business. Regardless how ridiculously stupid the above mentioned ideas sound like, the usa patent history is full of such applications and many of them are accepted as well.
So, if we knew day one day we are able to not manufacture even board games without having to pay royalties, we might have patented a dice, which has been used and discussed in India because the times during Mahabharata.
What’s urgently required is formation of any good panel which does a complete investigation before approving patent and constantly reviews any approved patent. In the event the company filing the patent, don’t utilize it within next 3-five-years, the patent becomes null and void, if patent seems irrelevant after 3-5 years then it should be discarded. The identical ought to be done in case where company filing patent has recovered all research and development expenses associated with patent and all past unsuccessful trials and has already made handsome profits with similar. If the patent filing company keeps licensing their patents to other companies, the patent should expire much sooner than the 20 year span. Even if one of the above rules are materialized, the patent market will be far more regulated and tznwus won’t be such high exploitation from the Inventhelp Patent Information.
So, when RiceTec applied a patent for Basmati rice, the first question might have been that why they wish to use the word Basmati, the premium American and Pakistani rice breed, that is most popular and dear. An additional research would have said that their genetic breed has qualities of extra long length, width and fragrance that are all linked to the traditional Basmati breed harvested near Himalayas. After such findings, they would have been interrogated on the usage of brands ‘Texmati’ and ‘Kasmati’ (name sounding much like Basmati) labeled to deceive buyers. Once the entire case was created, the organization should have been compelled to stop selling any breed of rice altogether.
But, not one of the above action points is ever going to be taken in a land where any corrupt company can lobby the federal government ruling the land and force these to add new injunctions in law or amend legal requirements within their favor.